Showing posts with label US Navy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Navy. Show all posts

Friday, May 30, 2008

McCain An Admiral? Please.

McCain Media Mancrush Alert

Someone is peddling a demonstrable lie:
He had found a sense of purpose in an apprenticeship to some of the Senate’s fiercest cold warriors. And in Senator John G. Tower, a hawkish Texas Republican, he had found a new mentor, beginning a relationship that many compared to the bond between a father and son.

With Mr. Tower’s encouragement, Mr. McCain declined the prospect of his first admiral’s star to make a run for Congress, saying that he could “do more good there,” Mr. Lehman recalled. But Mr. Lehman knew duty was only part of the reason.

“He just loved it up there,” Mr. Lehman recalled. “Like very few military people, John heard the music up there, and he really wanted to do it.”

From prisoner of war to politician in a hurry, it was the turning point that started Mr. McCain on the trajectory toward the Republican presidential nomination this year.

After five and a half years of listening to senators’ antiwar speeches over prison camp loudspeakers, Mr. McCain came home in 1973 contemptuous of America’s elected officials, convinced Congress had betrayed the country’s fighting men by hamstringing the war effort. But in the halls of the Senate, he discovered a new calling, at once high-minded and glamorous.


This is the same John Tower who was such a raging party animal drunk he couldn't get confirmed as Secretary of Defense?

There was no way McCain was ever going to pin on an Admiral's star--he was known far and wide in Washington as a womanizing party animal himself. It's fitting that Tower would be his mentor.

The always unhinged Ted Sampley fills us in by going to Robert Timberg:


At the Academy, aside being known as a "rowdy, raunchy, underachiever" who resented authority, Midshipman McCain became infamous as a leader among his fellow midshipmen for organizing "off-Yard activities" and hard drinking parties. Robert Timberg wrote in his book, The Nightingale's Song, that "being on liberty with John McCain was like being in a train wreck."


[SNIP]

Timberg described McCain's advancement: "in the fall of 1974, McCain was transferred to Jacksonville as the executive officer of Replacement Air Group 174, the long-sought flying billet at last a reality. A few months later, he assumed command of the RAG, which trained pilots and crews for carrier deployments. The assignment was controversial, some calling it favoritism, a sop to the famous son of a famous father and grandfather, since he had not first commanded a squadron, the usual career path."

While Executive Officer and later as Squadron Commander McCain used his authority to arrange frequent flights that allowed him to carouse with subordinates and "engage in extra-marital affairs."

This was a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice rules against adultery and fraternization with subordinates. But, as with all his other past behaviors, McCain was never penalized; instead he always got away with his transgressions.

Timberg wrote, "Off duty, usually on routine cross-country flights to Yuma and El Centro, John started carousing and running around with women. To make matters worse, some of the women with whom he was linked by rumor were subordinates . . . At the time the rumors were so widespread that, true or not, they became part of McCain's persona, impossible not to take note of."

In early 1977, Admiral Jim Holloway, Chief of Naval Operations promoted McCain to captain and transferred him from his command position "to Washington as the number-two man in the Navy's Senate liaison office. McCain was promptly given total control of the office. It wasn't long before the "fun loving and irreverent" McCain had turned the liaison office into a "late-afternoon gathering spot where senators and staffers, usually from the Armed Services and Foreign Relations committees, would drop in for a drink and the chance to unwind."


Forgive the lengthy excerpt, but does this sound like a man who envisioned pinning on an Admiral's star? Once again, the source is Robert Timberg:

In 1979, John McCain came face to face with his future.

He was in Hawaii, attending a military reception. While there, he met a young, blond former cheerleader from Phoenix named Cindy Hensley.

McCain was immediately dazzled and spent the event chatting her up.

"She was lovely, intelligent and charming, 17 years my junior but poised and confident," McCain wrote in his 2002 book, Worth the Fighting For. "I monopolized her attention the entire time, taking care to prevent anyone else from intruding on our conversation. When it came time to leave the party, I persuaded her to join me for drinks at the Royal Hawaiian Hotel. By the evening's end, I was in love."

McCain recalls that both he and Cindy initially misled each other about their ages. McCain made himself a little younger, and Cindy made herself a little older. They found out their real ages when the local paper published them. McCain was 43, Cindy 25.

"So our marriage," McCain cracks, "is really based on a tissue of lies."

Early in the courtship, McCain called Cindy from Beijing, where he was traveling with a Senate Foreign Relations Committee contingent. Cindy was in the hospital recuperating from minor knee surgery. She thanked him for the lovely flowers in her room, sent from "John."

What McCain didn't tell Cindy was that he hadn't sent the flowers. They were from another John, who lived in Tucson.

"I never thanked him," Cindy notes with a grin.

After a whirlwind courtship, John asked Cindy to marry him. But there were some details to clear out of the way.

McCain needed a divorce from Carol, his wife of 14 years from whom he was separated. After McCain's dramatic homecoming from Vietnam, the couple grew apart. Their marriage began disintegrating while McCain was stationed in Jacksonville. McCain has admitted to having extramarital affairs.

"If there was one couple that deserved to make it, it was John and Carol McCain," author Robert Timberg wrote in John McCain: An American Odyssey. "They endured nearly six years of unspeakable trauma with courage and grace. In the end it was not enough. They won the war but lost the peace."

In February 1980, less than a year after he met Cindy, McCain petitioned a Florida court to dissolve his marriage to Carol, calling the union "irretrievably broken."

Bud Day, a lawyer and fellow POW, handled the divorce proceedings.

"I thought things were going fairly well, and then it just came apart," Day later recalled. "That happened to quite a few. . . . I don't fault (Carol), and I don't really fault John, either."

In his book Worth the Fighting For, McCain offers his own post-mortem on his failed marriage. He "had not shown the same determination to rebuild (his) personal life" as he had to excel in his naval career.

"Sound marriages can be hard to recover after great time and distance have separated a husband and wife. We are different people when we reunite," McCain wrote. "But my marriage's collapse was attributable to my own selfishness and immaturity more than it was to Vietnam, and I cannot escape blame by pointing a finger at the war. The blame was entirely mine."

Carol, who remains on good terms with her former husband, generally has avoided reporters interested in hearing her side of the story.

She did briefly address her divorce to Timberg: "The breakup of our marriage was not caused by my accident or Vietnam or any of those things. I don't know that it might not have happened if John had never been gone. I attribute it more to John turning 40 and wanting to be 25 again than I do to anything else."

In the divorce settlement, McCain was generous with Carol, the mother of their daughter Sidney and two sons, whom McCain had adopted. Among other things, McCain gave Carol the rights to houses in Florida and Virginia and agreed to provide insurance or pay for additional treatment she was expected to require.

Except for signing the property settlement, Carol did not participate in the divorce. A court summons and other paperwork sent to her during the proceeding went unanswered.

In April 1980, the judge entered a default judgment and declared the marriage dissolved.

A month later, McCain married Cindy in Phoenix, where the couple would move. The wedding party included a couple of McCain's high-profile friends from Washington. Sen. William Cohen was the best man. Sen. Gary Hart was a groomsman.

Carol went her separate way, finding work as a personal aide to Nancy Reagan during the 1980 presidential primary campaign and later running the White House Visitors Office.


McCain for Congress
The move to Arizona was convenient for the budding politico McCain. After the 1980 census, Arizona was sure to get a new, fifth congressional seat.

But was it too convenient?

McCain explains the reaction of some of his new neighbors: "My ambition was plainly obvious, and to some, it was presumptuous and arrogant. If not said, it was thought by many that when I had decided to start a political career, I had looked around the country for a place where I thought the locals were gullible enough to take a chance on a novice. Worse, some critics contended that I had married Cindy because of her Arizona residency and her wealth and connections there. Neither charge is fair, and I am surprised at how angry I still become when some fool hints that such ruthlessness lay behind decisions to marry and relocate."

McCain truly was at a turning point in his life and ready for a new challenge.

He had a new wife. He retired from the Navy in 1981. His father, Adm. Jack McCain, died on March 22, 1981.

Politics occupied his mind.

According to Timberg's book, McCain actually had toyed with the idea of seeking a House seat as far back as 1976, when he was still living in Florida, but determined he probably couldn't win. After his Senate liaison duty, it became an obsession.


During his run for Congress, McCain dealt with these issues as only he can:

McCain confronted Mack after a subsequent campaign event.

McCain recounts in his book: "When the debate ended, I walked over to the opponent who had attempted to mine some little nasty opposition research from my failed marriage and told him with as much steel as I'm capable of demonstrating, 'If you ever try to hurt anyone in my family again, I will personally beat the shit out of you.'"


Monday, May 19, 2008

"I am no longer prepared to wait until everyone is in agreement"


So says Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi about the ongoing saga of uncollected trash in Naples, Italy:

[from the BBC] Firefighters battled overnight in the southern Italian city of Naples to extinguish dozens of blazes as angry residents set rubbish piles alight.

The city has some 3,500 tonnes of uncollected rubbish, piled up around its streets.

Italy's prime minister is due to hold a cabinet meeting in the city on Wednesday to address the crisis.

Silvio Berlusconi has hinted he may force local councils to accept new rubbish dumps, despite opposition.

"I am no longer prepared to wait until everyone is in agreement, while the piles of rubbish become mountains of trash," Mr Berlusconi is quoted as saying in Italy's La Repubblica newspaper.

Last week, residents of towns in the region took to the streets in Naples to protest against planned rubbish dumps and processing plants.

There are an estimated 45,000 tonnes of rubbish on the streets in the wider Campania region.




Despite the fact that railcars are expected to begin hauling the trash to Germany this week, the US military has been looking into whether or not to remove Navy personnel from Naples because of the health risks:

The Navy would consider relocating some sailors and their families if health studies show that the continuing trash crisis in the city poses short or long-term health risks.

While details for any plans still are too premature to discuss, Navy officials want people living in the area to know that relocation is an option that the Navy is taking seriously, said Lt. Cmdr. Wendy Snyder, a spokeswoman for Navy Region Europe.


And, yes--it's because of the mafia:

Over the past 13 years, the authorities are estimated to have spent over 1.3bn euros ($2bn) trying and failing to clean up the streets.

Italy argues that part of the problem lies with the local mafia, the Camorra, who are said to control much of the waste business.

In a separate development, the European Commission issued a warning to the Italian government that it was not complying with an earlier ruling from the court of justice on the way rubbish was collected in the Lazio region.

Monday, March 3, 2008

Here's What Neglecting Our Obligations Gets Us


Hey, wouldn't it be nice to have the ability to do something when things like this happen?

CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez moved tanks to the Colombian border and mobilized fighter jets on Sunday, warning Bogota could spark a war after its troops struck inside another of its neighbors, Ecuador.

Reacting to Colombia's killing on Saturday of a Colombian rebel over the border in Ecuador, a Venezuelan ally, Chavez also withdrew all of his diplomats from Bogota in the worst dispute between the neighbors since he came to office in 1999.

"Mr. Defense Minister, move me 10 battalions to the frontier with Colombia immediately, tank battalions. The air force should mobilize," Chavez said, adding he will bolster his military's presence along the 1,400-mile (2,200-km) border.

"May God spare us a war. But we are not going to allow them violate our sovereign territory," the ex-paratrooper added on his weekly TV show.

Colombia's military said on Saturday troops killed Raul Reyes, a leader of Marxist FARC rebels, during an attack on a jungle camp in Ecuador in a severe blow to Latin America's oldest guerrilla insurgency. The operation included air strikes and fighting with rebels across the frontier.

The anti-U.S. Chavez, who had warned a similar operation in Venezuela would be "cause for war," threatened to send Russian-made fighter jets into U.S. ally Colombia if its troops struck inside his OPEC country.


As this escalates, we'll see just how much actual leverage we have in areas of the world that we've been neglecting. We don't need a full blown war in South America right now, or anywhere else, for that matter. We don't have the resources to step in and protect our interests.

Monday, January 7, 2008

And So it Begins

When I put up this post, I figured it would draw fire. I deliberately chose to view this incident OUTSIDE of a Bush/Cheney/Neocon worldview and I wrote it as if Barack Obama/John Edwards/Hillary Clinton were President.

Why?

Because Bush/Cheney are not "forever." In about a year, we're going to have a foreign policy once again. We're going to be tested. We're going to have to think of a world where there is no Bush/Cheney to have a kneejerk reaction to.

Liberals/Progressives better wake the fuck up--we're going to be tested once the insane and criminal batch of current office holders leave office. Didn't any of you read McGovern's op-ed? Yes, they SHOULD be impeached. They likely won't be impeached.

But that doesn't change the fact that an American President is going to see our forces targeted, provoked and attacked in the future. There will be future attacks on US interests.

And if the prevailing worldview is to view things through the distortion of a Bush/Cheney worldview, we're in for a real treat. Because sometimes, sometimes, the use of American military power is justified. It is not "war mongering" and it is not "reckless" in any way, shape or form to protect the world's oil supply--

--we've been doing it in the Persian Gulf since Ronald Reagan was President, and that blue water Navy of ours gets more and more important by the day.

It's called China. And their blue water navy gets bigger every day.

So grow up, kids. Grow the fuck up. Some day soon, the grownups are going to be back in charge, and if we tie their hands, we're going to see a resurgence in the "neocon" worldview, whether we like it or not.





[A photo of the Strait of Hormuz from the Space Shuttle]



U.S. says Iranian gunboats harassed warships

By Jim Miklaszewski
NBC News


WASHINGTON - Iranian Revolutionary Guard gunboats harassed three U.S. Navy warships in the Strait of Hormuz Sunday, in what the U.S. military considers a "significant provocative act."

Military officials told NBC News that two U.S. Navy destroyers and one frigate were heading into the Persian Gulf through the international waters of the Strait of Hormuz when five armed "fast boats" of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard approached a high speed, darting in and out of the formation.

At one point a radio message from one of the Iranian boats warned, "You are going to blow up within minutes."

The Navy warships went into defensive mode, radioed the usual warnings to steer clear, and in the end no shots were fired. U.S. military warships believe the Revolutionary Guard boats were "testing our defenses," the officials said.

The United States expressed concern when the Revolutionary Guard forces took over Iranian naval operations in the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz from the regular navy more than five months ago.


First of all, this is a joke, plain and simple. No "Iranian Fast Boat" should ever be allowed to approach a US Warship. I don't know what the rules of engagement were, but it's pretty simple--if a vessel approaches a US Navy vessel in open waters, and behaves in a threatening manner, then that vessel should be blown out of the water.

If you want to be taken seriously in the world, yes--you should prefer diplomacy. You should never start a war so that you can work out your "daddy issues" at the expense of 3,900+ dead Americans. But the use of military force to protect American lives is sometimes justified.

I'm not for warmongering. I'm for common sense. And the lives of the Americans on those warships are too goddamned valuable to allow some academic exercise in open waters. The example of what happened to the USS Cole is just too hard to forget. And, of course, the US Navy should have then picked up any survivors and dropped them off at the nearest port. I don't know how you survive being blown up in a fast boat, but I also don't doubt the professionalism of our Navy. It's not by accident that the Navy is running most of the military right now, and most of the "conscience" about things comes from highly trained and professional Navy officers right now. The other services have some issues they need to work on, and they would benefit from spending some time figuring out how the Navy instills the right traits in its leaders. Just sayin'.

The Iranians are not a threat per se to the existence of the United States. But when they do stupid shit, they deserve to be poked in the eye and told to back off. There is a struggle within Iran, and perhaps the lack of judgement on the part of some of their more radical elements--for example, whoever thought it would be a good idea to stage this particular stunt--should be demonstrated back to them. If person X thought it was a good idea, then person X in the Iranian leadership can sit back and explain why several sunken fast boats achieved their goals. It would make for an interesting meeting, I guess.

I commend the Navy for not removing a few Iranian fast boats from the Iranian Navy's inventory, but what is this really all about? What is really going on here?

UPDATE 1: From the Pentagon, as seen on Thinkprogress.org--

Pentagon says U.S. ships harassed by Iranians.

“In what is being called a serious provocation, Iranian Revolutionary Guard boats harassed and provoked three U.S. Navy ships in the strategic Strait of Hormuz,” Pentagon officials said. According to one official, “Five small [Iranian] boats were acting in a very aggressive way… and causing our ships to take evasive maneuvers.” The AP reports:

“There were no injuries but there very well could have been,” he said, adding that the Iranian boats turned away “literally at the very moment that U.S. forces were preparing to open fire” in self defense.

He said he didn’t have the precise transcript of communications that passed between the two forces, but the Iranians radioed something to the effect that “we’re coming at you and you’ll explode in a couple minutes.”


Again--no question. Had the US Navy blown these craft out of the water, I would be the first to applaud their efforts at defending themselves. Someone in the Iranian regime is clearly agitating for a confrontation, one we should not to back down from.